Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Clippers Need To Realize That Spurs Are The Anti-Grizzlies

What should Arizona coach Mike Stoops do with his two QBs?

It’s a valid question. More now than ever, with the stellar performance of backup QB Matt Scott. Clearly, Scott won’t be stealing the starting job. But does that mean that coach Stoops will banish him to the bench? Maybe not.

Nick Foles is, when healthy, the better and more accurate passer. No question. Scott, however, has vastly improved his passing game this season and is a major threat to scramble for first downs and more. As demonstrated in the Washington game, Scott’s mobility could make him a more ‘dangerous’ QB than Foles. Was Scott passing as accurate as Foles does on a regular basis? No. But that is more a statement of Foles’ incredible accuracy. Matt Scott possesses above average accuracy, and the ability, when his WR’s are covered, to run for the first down and keep a drive alive.

So cue the talk from coach Stoops of working in a package for Scott in each game. Now I know that anybody who watched this process last season is groaning at that possibility. I am one of the people that has been so dead set against it. But let me play devil’s advocate here.

Star-divide

While the previous incarnation of this idea didn’t work at all, it may have been the way Scott was used that led to its failure. Scott was sent in cold, and often ran designed QB run plays. The defense would count on him running the ball, and thus he was largely ineffective. I propose a different system.

Instead of putting Scott in for only one series, put him in for three to four. Maybe one per quarter. He can handle it, and wouldn’t be coming in cold. Ditch the designed run plays, as was the case in the Washington game, and let him run only when nobody is open. The benefits to this are obvious. It would force the coaching staff to commit to establishing the run, something Arizona fans have been screaming for and worked very well last week. It would force opposing defenses to prep for two different offenses, leaving them less prepared than they would have otherwise been. It would keep two QB’s ‘hot’, something that would pay immediate dividends should either of them be injured.

I propose that coach Stoops start doing this against UCLA, to force Stanford to prepare for both a pocket and a dual-threat QB. If Foles looks anything less than 100%, pull him after a few plays. This will lead to speculation that he has been benched in favor of Scott. Again, that would lead to Stanford wondering who to prepare for.

 

Yes, I am very much aware that I’m starting to sound like tinfoil hat guy. Yes, I’m aware that I railed against a two-QB system earlier this season. But after seeing how much Scott has improved his passing game and his decision making skills, I really believe this can and will work.

Don’t agree? Tell me. And if you’ve got a better idea of how to utilize Scott, put it in the comments. I’d really enjoy reading it.

Bear Down, ‘Cat fans. Beat UCLA!

Poll
What should Arizona do with its QBs?
Play Foles only.
20 votes
Play Scott only.
17 votes
Start Foles, but give Scott one series per game.
23 votes
Start Foles, and give Scott 3 - 4 series per game.
91 votes
Start Wilbur the Wildcat!!
16 votes

167 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

UCLA game

Scott should be the starter and let Foles heal completely. I’m not saying UCLA should be looked over, but I think Scott is more then capable of handling them. There is no need to risk further injusy to Foles when we will need him down the stretch. Plus it should give further fear in the rest of the PAC-10’s D-cords when Scott performs well for a second straight week. Stoops should start the dual QB threat starting the last four very tough games.

The dual QB in game system should not be off the table. Does everyone remember the Smith-Jenkins combo? They made a fantastic team and I think Foles and Scott can handle their egoes of the other playing. Only things that should be on their minds is winning and getting to the Roses!!!

Bear Down, Go Cats!!!

by F'nA on Oct 28, 2010 4:32 AM PDT reply actions  

Here's a thought

Why don’t we come up with a modified Wildcat formation with both of our QBs lined up in the shotgun next to each other? This would allow us to get both of them as much playing time as they can handle and would give opposing defensive cordinators fits trying to figure out how to stop it.

by DirtyOgre on Oct 28, 2010 8:20 AM PDT reply actions  

UCLA Game: Start Scott, dress Foles

Foles should not play until it is assured he is 100% recovered. If this was the ASU game, and the Rose Bowl hung in the balance, I would likely feel differently, but it’s not.

Give Scott another start. Have Foles prepared as the emergency back-up, if he can go at all. The Stanford-USC-Oregon-ASU stretch is huge. No matter how good Arizona has looked thus far, those 4 games will define the season. That’s it. Foles needs to be healthy for the last month.

I’d rather have the tough decision of who to start against Stanford, than being forced to start Scott because Foles re-injured his knee and is out for the year.

by Smooty on Oct 28, 2010 8:36 AM PDT reply actions  

And, if you're referring to long-term, and not just UCLA....

Healthy Nick Foles is my call.

I don’t care if Matt Scott gets 3 plays or 10 plays. Foles is the starter, and in crunch-time, if Arizona needs a drive to win the game, I want Foles in there. Foles has done it twice this season, under pretty dire circumstances.

Against Iowa, ALL of the momentum had swung to Iowa’s side. What does Foles do? Calmly tells his players he loves them, and that they’re going to go win this game. /Swaggered.

Against Cal, the offense didn’t do shit all day. Was Foles rattled? Not when he hooked up with Juron and led the Cats to victory.

Scott is talented. But Foles is the better quarterback.

by Smooty on Oct 28, 2010 8:41 AM PDT reply actions  

Agreed with previous comments.

Start Scott. Let Foles heal completely. Besides, Scott wants to prove something. He won’t be looking past UCLA, he’ll be looking to bury them.

When Foles is completly healthy, bring Scott in for 4 series, give or take.

by psknapp on Oct 28, 2010 9:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Let me also play devil's advocate

Matt Scott is ranked 15th (of 122) in this week’s Positive Impact Factor standings. The Positive Impact Factor takes into account the impact of the total touches of a QB not just passing stats. Foles is ranked 48th. The contrast between the rating for the two guys for Arizona is not nearly as marked as Jarrett Lee v. Jordan Jefferson at LSU…but it might be enough to make you think about it. Good to see this blog on ballhyped.

In The Bleachers

by Patrick_the_Ruminator on Oct 28, 2010 12:50 PM PDT reply actions  

Really interesting.

That link was an interesting read. I’ll be keeping an eye on that list from now on.

Patrick Evans (uofafanatic)

by uofafanatic on Oct 28, 2010 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks

I’ll be including Nick Foles in a future Positive Impact Factor post about the NFL Draft and see how he stacks up against Ricky Stanzi, Kirk Cousins, Blaine Gabbert and others.

In The Bleachers

by Patrick_the_Ruminator on Oct 30, 2010 2:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Arizona Wildcats.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
PAC 12 TOURNAMENT TICKETS

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Arizonawildcats_small joenewby4040

Friday_mc_002_small K_Zim

Blitz-mini__1__small Kyle Kensing