Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Roundtable: Which Draft Pick Is Most Likely To Bust?

Oregon wins, with another display of their great conditioning.

Photo

The Oregon game worked out about how most thought it would.  Oregon played like the number one team in the nation, and didn't get discouraged while playing from behind for most of the first half.  The 'gimmick' of running the plays ultra-fast is definitely paying off in the second half, as was evident last night.  Watching the game, it was clear that the Oregon offense is truly a simple one, that is run efficiently.

Arizona coach Mike Stoops should take a lesson from Oregon coach Chip Kelly, and run more fast-paced practice sessions.  Cardio won and lost this game.  It was most evident in the fourth quarter, when the Arizona secondary seemed completely gassed.  Their legs were completely gone.  I'm not proposing a complete defensive change, I trust Stoops' defensive pedigree.  I'm simply proposing running the practice at a much faster pace, with fewer rest breaks, in order to increase the endurance of the players.

Running your offense as fast as Oregon does, and running your practices equally as fast, are not revolutionary ideas.  Anybody that has ever done regular cardio training of any kind can attest to the benefits.  Which is why it is so confusing that Oregon is the only team that has successfully implemented their fast-paced style so far.  Good job, coach Kelly, your team deserved to win this one.

More after the jump, including my call for a change on the Arizona depth chart.

Star-divide

On a positive note, I was impressed with RB Nic Grigsby.  He looked better than he has in over a month.  Certainly, part of that is him finally being healthy.  But I like to think that officially losing his starting spot lit a fire under his butt.  I've been waiting all season for him to get back to his Sophomore form, and he finally flashed glimpses of it last night.  Let's hope he fully unleashes that great ability on the Sun Devils this coming Thursday.

Now for my crazy time.  You will all likely disagree with the following statement, but I stand by it.  QB Matt Scott needs to start.  Nick Foles was amazing last night.  But he needed to be better.  He was unable to escape the blitz in the second half, and was forced to throw the ball away.  Worse, he was 'throwing the ball away' dangerously close to defensive players.  In one case, it should have been picked off as it bounced off of a Duck.

It is easy to look at a QB that is performing poorly on the field, and that has bad stats, and say you need to make a change.  Nick Foles is not a bad QB.  If Arizona had nobody behind him with any real talent or experience, he'd be in no danger.  This situation is more difficult.  Matt Scott has top-level ability with his arm and his legs.  He has experience, and has a firm grasp of the offense.  Even if Nick Foles has the best stats in the nation, it is meaningless if Arizona loses.  This is the third week in a row that we've all had to read about how good Nick Foles performed in the loss.  I'm sick of it.

Matt Scott is a much better fit for this offense.  Look at the stats.  Not his stats, the overall rushing stats.  In games in which Matt Scott started, the Arizona offense averaged 249 yards rushing.  In games in which Nick Foles started, (Not including the Washington St. game, as he left the game early with an injury.), the Arizona offense averaged 108.9 yards rushing.  This was not at the expense of an effective passing attack.  Scott completed 72.4% of his passes, and averaged 236 yards passing.  While Scott contributed 3 passing TDs through his two game stint as starter, the RBs added 6 TDs in those games.

Say what you will about how amazing Nick Foles is, but the Arizona offense just runs better with Matt Scott under center.  If Scott really is healthy, I say start him against the Sun Devils in preparation for whatever bowl game the Wildcats participate in.

Disagree with me?  Tell me why in the comments.

Poll
What do you think?
Start Matt Scott. The offense as a whole works better with him under center.
45 votes
Start Nick Foles. He is the better pure QB, and the best hope for the Wildcats to win now.
94 votes
Not sure.
12 votes

151 votes | Poll has closed

Wildcats Fan Confidence Poll

Last tallied on 11/24.

07|1:|0|100&chxt=x,y&chco=5098c7&chd=t:75

more regional sports SB Nation Arizona

Comment 3 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Yes I am all for Scott

Nick did an excellent job in the air last night, no doubt. But because he lacks mobility there were times were he threw dangerous passes. A couple on minutes into the 3rd quarter they should have put in Scott. There were 4 drives in a row without a score. After the first 2 failed drives Scott should have been under center. Foles went under for 4 drives straight, and then picked it up in the 4th, but by then it was to late to play catch up. When foles couldn’t get 6 points on the board after 2 drives they should have put in Matt. Why would you leave a weapon on the bench? At first i was like its good to have a decent backup. But sorry Scott is starter quality. And if Arizona is not going to do right by him, then he should leave and go were his skills would be appreciate. There was no reason Scott should have sat the bench, and Foles went 4 drives straight without a score. Who cares if Foles got career high in passing, they still lost. The running game was peaking, but still wasn’t good enough. Arizona needs the ran aspect back in order to progress. Only an idiot leaves a threat on the bench. Scott should be playing way more. Even if foles continues to start, then Scott should be in more than a few series. During foles melt down in the 3rd, Scott could have helped. Arizona had the game, but when Foles didn’t score those 4 drives, it made it easy for Oregon, who continued to score. Either use your talent you have on the bench for God knows what reason, or I hope that Matt goes somewhere else next year were he would be appreciated.

by football geek on Nov 27, 2010 2:06 PM PST reply actions  

What's the difference in the schedule in Scott's vs Foles' starts?

We weren’t beating Oregon. The defense has been the problem the past handful of weeks.

"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin

by dcrockett17 on Nov 27, 2010 5:15 PM PST reply actions  

My vote is for combo

dcrockett17, you are right to a point. the defense looked decent on Friday until the offense kept going 3 n out. This type of play really wears down a defense and especially an offense like Oregon. The point here is that if Scott was in, we would have controlled the clock by running the ball more often. If our offense is on the field, guess who is not?? That’s right the high octane Oregon offense! I fully agree with uafanatic and fb geek that Scott should have started or at least given a shot to change the pace. Some experts question using a two QBs system, but it has worked in the past. It worked here in this program with the Jenkins/Smith combo. Same set of skills and talent as we got now. We should have used them. Bear Down folks, I think they played a heck of a game. They played so much better then they did against USC and Stanford, UO just outran us.

by F'nA on Nov 28, 2010 10:15 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Arizona Wildcats.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
PAC 12 TOURNAMENT TICKETS

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Arizonawildcats_small joenewby4040

Friday_mc_002_small K_Zim

Blitz-mini__1__small Kyle Kensing