Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Goes Hollywood With Awards Ceremony

How should the Arizona Wildcats use QB Matt Scott?

Once again, the subject of how and when to use QB Matt Scott has arisen. It is a difficult question to ignore. He is clearly the backup. QB Nick Foles is the unquestioned starter. But Scott is just too good an athlete to have him sitting on the bench. I find myself struggling with the issue as a fan. I want so bad for him to be the promised savior of the Wildcats faithful. The heir to Tuitama that would be able to run like the wind, and fire accurately downfield.  But based on his performances throughout last season, and what little I have seen from the scrimmage on Aug. 21st, he is not that guy. Scott is undeniably fast. When he runs with the football, he is a sight to behold. Fast. Nimble. Tough. Unfortunately, his passing skills have been sub-standard thus far. And all that speed, and all those moves mean nothing. If you can’t convince the defense that you are a serious threat to toss it deep, your running lanes are going to be closed.  

On the subject of Scott-specific packages, I am wholeheartedly against them. I am not a football coach, and I readily admit that the coaching staff of the Arizona Wildcats knows much, much more than I do about football. That said, I hate pulling your QB1, and putting in a backup for a series. Look at last season, it was awful. And unfair to Scott. He comes into the game, and now the offense has to adjust from a pocket QB to a scrambler. Scott has been on the bench to this point, but the defense is loose and ready. It's a recipe for disaster. And three and outs. And interceptions.

Star-divide

 

My humble suggestion? Put Scott in at WR. Not every series, just as a situational WR. Can you imagine the opposing D coordinator? "What are they doing? Will he be a receiver? Will they lateral the ball to him and have him toss it down field?" How do they defend him?  If the defense double teams him, that leaves another WR open. That alone would justify him being on the field. If the defense puts just one DB on him, his size and speed would be an advantage. If the defense gives him a cushion, they risk Foles tossing a lateral to Scott, and now Scott can either pass or run, and with a cushion, he could get 5 or more yards, easy.

Now, I know this is all easier said than done. But that’s the benefit of not being a football coach. I get to play the "what if?" game. And the more I think about it, the more Scott as a WR just sounds cool to me.

Realistically, I imagine that the Wildcats will have Scott doing more of the same this year. Subbing in for a series. I truly hope it works. I just don’t believe it will. Can’t wait to see how he does in his first series, presumably against the Toledo Rockets.

My vote remains for Scott as a WR, or as the second QB in the wildcat formation. Admit it. If nothing else, Wouldn't that be fun to watch?

Thanks to Smooty for getting me all fired up over the Matt Scott situation. 

Poll
How do you think the Wildcats should use Matt Scott?
Use him as a backup QB only. Keep him on the bench until it’s time for the mop up crew.
12 votes
Use him as a change of pace guy. Put a package in for him every game.
25 votes
Use him in a "wildcat" formation as the secondary QB.
47 votes
Use him as a situational WR.
20 votes
Are you crazy? QB1!
6 votes

110 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I vote change of pace.

He is quick but last year’s Iowa game is the only thing that sticks out in my mind. He was terrible. He couldn’t pass and they shut him down quickly because they made him one dimensional.

I hope they find a spot for him.

by joenewby4040 on Aug 23, 2010 6:36 PM PDT reply actions  

NOT TO SURE!

Matt is a video game QB and nothing else. I also hoped like every other Wildcat fan he was going to be the answer but was let down. I agree he should be moved to WR spot or even a DB when the other offense uses a 5 wide set. With his speed and being able to break ankles like no other I hope Stoops can find the right spot for him

by incubusrascing2006 on Aug 23, 2010 8:02 PM PDT reply actions  

I agree with you, in theory. But with the current QB roster, I don’t see any way that Stoops will allow a position move for Scott. Bierne looked better than last season in the scrimmage, but that was just 20 minutes. And I doubt he is ready to be the backup QB.

by uofafanatic on Aug 24, 2010 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yea for stories and football season again!

But yea, that Iowa game still haunts me

The Ralphie Report - University of Colorado Athletics
SB Nation Denver

by Jon Woods on Aug 23, 2010 8:11 PM PDT reply actions  

My thoughts

Scott would be awesome at QB if the UA ran a triple option. This would exploit his given talents and his limited passing ability. The dual QB worked during the Smith-Jenkings duo for a year then became too much the following year. I think Stoops needs to stay with Foles and only use Scott as the back up. The only way I’d be ok with Scott moving positions is if Beirne or Allerheiligen is ready to step up as the go to back up. Which I don’t think they are ready.

by F'nA on Aug 24, 2010 3:29 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree, Scott would be lethal in a triple option. But in this offense, you must be able to consistantly produce yards through the air.

by uofafanatic on Aug 24, 2010 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

Tough Question

But, I think they could use Scott very sparingly in Wildcat type packages. It would enable Arizona to use players like Bug Wright and Travis Cobb on fly-sweep plays, while freezing the defense enough because Scott is the running threat that Foles is most definitely not.

I think if Scott was put to the task of perfecting a few play-action pass plays out of a Wildcat package, and was otherwise free to run and improvise, it could be an effective use of him — albeit, just not the use we all imagined two years ago.

With that said, I am firmly behind Foles as the starting quarterback. I absolutely do not want to see Scott in there if Foles has a bad series or two. He is QB1, and Scott has done nothing to unseat that.

by Smooty on Aug 24, 2010 8:07 AM PDT reply actions  

"It would enable Arizona to use players like Bug Wright and Travis Cobb on fly-sweep plays..."

I am a big ‘Bug’ Wright guy. Anything to get the ball into his hands gets my vote. He is VERY underrated.

by uofafanatic on Aug 24, 2010 10:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

It could work well

Especially if Scott is at QB, and he occasionally pulls the hand-off back, and takes off himself. The threat of the QB running will make the fly-sweep more effective.

Also, when healthy, Travis Cobb is reportedly one of the fastest players on the field. I know he is being nagged by a hip injury, but hopefully he gets back up to full speed soon.

by Smooty on Aug 24, 2010 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Arizona Wildcats.

Managers

Arizonawildcats_small joenewby4040

Friday_mc_002_small K_Zim

Small mikeschmitz

Editors

Cason_td_3_small Smooty

Background_small UofAlec

Black_knight_by_daveigo_small Kazper

Blitz-mini__1__small Kyle Kensing