Arizona Wildcats get mixed bag with regard to returning players.
With all the uncertainty over who Arizona Wildcats coach Mike Stoops will hire, I'd like to turn the focus to the players for a bit. Heading into the 2011 season, there are positives and negatives with regard to players leaving and staying. In the past week or so, there have been announcements that were exciting, and deflating. So let's take a look at what we think we know so far.
Positives:
QB Nick Foles will return. While for me this is a negative, it is a positive for the Wildcats to have him on the roster next season. I personally would have liked to see Nick Foles enter the draft, and let Matt Scott take the QB1 slot uncontested. More on this in the 'negatives' section.
WR Juron Criner will return. This is the best news of the post-season so far. With Dan Buckner joining the WR corps, he and Juron Criner look to be among the best 1-2 WR combos in the nation. Coach stoops has already stated that he will be pushing the offense more towards a pass-friendly spread, so this offense could be prolific.
P Kyle Dugandzic signed a letter of intent to play for Arizona. Yes, Arizona has a new punter. I don't need to say a lot here. We all know the situation with the kickers. And yes, coach Stoops has stated that it is possible that another kicker will be signed. The only Arizona kicker that appears to be safe is John Bonano, who Stoops apparently likes as a kickoff specialist. Then again, if Kyle Dugandzic and a potential second recruit perform well enough, it is likely that none of the kickers from 2010 will see any time in 2011. Breathe a sigh of relief, Wildcat fans. Coach Stoops is addressing the horrible kicking situation.
Check out the negatives after the jump.
Negatives:
OL Vaughn Dotsy and DE Apaiata Tuihalamaka forced to end football careers due to injury. Ouch. The offensive and defensive lines looked to be a major question next season, and this news just makes it worse. Vaughn Dotsy was to be a leader on the offensive line, and will be sorely missed. Apaiata Tuihalamaka was to provide much needed depth at DE, and now the load on DT Justin Washington will be a bit heavier. Hopefully the new OL and DT coaches are up to the challenge. On a positive note, former co-offensive coordinator and OL coach Bill Bedenbaugh stated that the group likely to start on the OL next season looked to have the greatest potential of any he had coached. We'll see.
The QB controversy continues. Not only will Matt Scott and Nick Foles likely battle for the starting QB position in the 2011 pre-season, but if Scott doesn't win the starting job outright, he may redshirt, so he can start in 2012. This headache will never go away. I'll state this again. I'm pulling for Matt Scott to be the unquestioned starter at QB next season. He may not be as accurate as Foles, but few are. Let's go over why he should start.
-He is a good passer. He can make all the necessary throws, and looks to take another leap forward in his passing game over the summer.
-He is mobile. I'm not advocating a bunch of designed run plays. I'm saying that he is extremely talented at escaping the blitz, and making something out of nothing. Further, his ability to scramble forces defenses to play the run as well as the pass, leaving receivers open.
-When Scott plays, the entire offense is better. The rushing yardage is over 100 yards higher when Scott starts, and it is not at the expense of the passing game. Scott completed 71% of his passes this season, and was surprisingly accurate under pressure.
So, tell me what you think about these positives and negatives. Which excites or concerns you the most, and why?
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I am not sure tha Foles coming back is a negative.
He was still one of the best QBs in the Pac-10 and should be near the top in the new Pac-12. Add Foles to the return of Criner and the emergence of Buckner and I think we will be looking pretty good in the passing game.
I am excited to see Nwoko get more time at HB and provide the extra thump that we were missing with Grigsby and Antolin. It will be interesting to see how Daniel Jenkins and Ka’Deem Carey (if he signs) play in the spring.
Adam Hall looks like a pretty good player and an enforcer in the secondary and Shaq is exciting as well.
I think the important thing to remember going into this season is that UofA will not compete for the Pac-12 title. We need to get that into our heads. This team is flawed and with both lines being rebuilt we are going to have games that make us want to turn off the TV. We will be exciting however and should be able to hang a lot of points on any team that doesn’t take us seriously.
I expect 7-5 season with a few soul crushing losses but a surprise win at Stanford.
For the thirteen time in 3 or one evers, I found myself toothlessly thinking about Manny Ramirez.
Agreed
I think that Nick coming back is fantastic. Foles is not the problem with the offense, the problem is that we couldn’t run the ball (I’m looking at you offensive line). Yes Matt Scott looked good when he took over for Foles but remember he was playing against UCLA and Washington. He does help open up the run a bit but I think it was exaggerated with those two teams.
As for losing our Offensive line I’m choosing to look at that as a good thing their run blocking was atrocious this year so maybe its better that we are starting over on the O-Line.
Agreed with both comments above
I'd rather be surfing.
by Pac 10 Alum on Mar 6, 2011 11:14 AM PST up reply actions
Couldn't agree more about Foles.
Matt Scott should be the starting quarterback. Foles is about as mobile as Peyton Manning, and the only reason he completes a high number of passes is the ridiculous amount of screen and slant passes he throws.
"That guy mvhsbball is really an insufferable schmuck." - FuquaManuel
"Like we actually let mvhsbball do anything important." - cbwilk
Big Picture
I think you’re missing the big picture here on Foles returning. Its probably the best thing for the Wildcats. First of all, Stoops went out and hired a new offensive line coach and he has said his #1 objective is to improve the running game, so I think that should clear that up at least a little. Also, as stated above with Criner & Buckner next year it would be better for the team to move forward with their “pass friendly” approach with Foles mainly due to his ability to throw strikes of all kinds. Red shirting Matt Scott isn’t a bad idea I’m sure had Foles not got hurt this year that would have happened anyway considering he took under the minimum number of snaps vs Toledo. So that’s a positive too, that would be to have Scott to replace Foles upon his graduation. Not to mention as an avid college football fan, Foles showed great improvements from his first season as a starter to this season and I firmly believe mobility will be his number one priority this off season. Foles returning also creates a great opportunity for the Wildcats not just to win games but to lay the foundation for attracting great pro caliber QB’s to come to Arizona. Arizona has never had a quarterback drafted since they’ve joined the PAC 10, and if Foles was the first it would open the eyes those pro style HS QB’s out there to come to Arizona for college.
Redshirting Scott -- now that Savage will be on board -- makes more sense
Scott will probably not get his red shirt till later in the year. It will be a little closer to a “burn” a red shirt kind of situation. Now, on the other hand, if they both compete in the spring and Scott gets the nod, I’ve no problem with that, I just don’t think it’s going to happen. I disagree with the people who think the offensive football team athletes played better under Scott. You really cannot compare the two. Personally, I find more fault in the coaching then in the QB leadership.
I think having Savage and Scott for the future, especially if Foles is drafted high next year, also opens up more opportunities, as stated above, re football recruiting. USC is still piling on better QB recruits even though Barkley has been a clear four year starter. You could even say that the Cal Bears, in spite of the run of bad quarterbacking they have had since Aaron Rodgers left campus, had recruited, overall, better QBs by recruit rank, then Arizona has managed.
Again, I think the problem is coaching. The Mobile QB looks fun on TV, and it’s great to have that option, sure, but Manning didn’t get MVP honors because he was a crap QB.
I'd rather be surfing.
by Pac 10 Alum on Mar 6, 2011 11:20 AM PST up reply actions

by 














