Never will the college football postseason be unanimously satisfying, but it's apparent unsatisfying enough these days to warrant deep conversations across the nation regarding a potential college football playoff.
That's exactly what's going down in Phoenix this week, where Pac-12 officials are meeting to discuss a four-team playoff and how it'll affect the Conference of Champions itself, according to ESPN.
There's too many issues to expect any big changes to the BCS system in the next few months, and that's because of how many issues you can find in the conferences alone.
A couple issues from the get-go
- How many in-conference games should be played, and should it be equal amongst all BCS conferences? A big issue in the Pac-12 stems from the nine-game conference schedule, which is similar to the Big 12 but unlike the ACC, SEC and Big Ten, who play eight games in conference. Apparently, coaches in the Pac-12 are leaning toward dropping one game to put all conferences on the same plane of judgment come playoff time. However, athletic directors aren't so sound on that idea, as it obviously hurts in-league rivalries and, in a business mindset, costs the league some revenue.
Rodriguez also caught up with ESPN to chat about the upcoming season.
"I'm more concerned about getting one first down," Rodriguez said when asked about the playoff discussions.
Rodriguez on Matt Scott: "I wish I had him for a couple years. He picked it (the offense) up very quickly. I think he's hungry, like all of us, to try to prove himself."
Rodriguez on the implementation of the new defense: "It's been good. There's so much made about schemes, and really everybody, whether they have odd fronts or even fronts, they do about everything depending on down and distance and who you're playing. I like it because it's a little bit different. But more than anything because that's what our coaches know. And it's a relatively simple system to teach. Our guys took to it pretty well."